DENIAL
OF DEMOCRACY WILL FUEL EXTREMISM IN PAKISTAN
Commentary By Alok Bansal, Research Fellow at
the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (IDSA), New Delhi.
(12 September 2007)
The
manner in which former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was bundled off
to Saudi Arabia on his arrival in Pakistan clearly indicates that
'genuine functional democracy' is not going to be ushered in Pakistan
in the near future. President Pervez Musharraf may be down but he
is definitely not out, as the only institution that counts, namely
the army, still backs him and as long as he enjoys the support of
his uniformed colleagues, he can withstand any Nawaz Sharif or Benazir
Bhutto - US pressure on him notwithstanding.
It
is probably this realisation that has led Benazir to sue for peace
despite knowing full well that she will lose crucial public support,
as the public ratings of General Musharraf are today even lower
than that of President Bush. But Benazir reckons that Musharraf
is not going anywhere at least for the next two years and therefore
she wants to strike a deal with the military dictator ostensibly
at the behest of the US. Even though it was a military dictator,
who hanged her father, politics does make strange bedfellows.
Nawaz
Sharif had realised that any deal between Benazir and the military
would marginalize him as Benazir would try to occupy the secular
democratic space and the conglomerate of religious parties, MMA,
would take advantage of the overwhelming anti-Americanism prevalent
in Pakistani society today to occupy the oppositional space. This
could have led to the marginalization of Nawaz Sharif and his party,
which would have found the political space shrinking for them. This
actually forced Nawaz Sharif's hand and he had to publicly announce
his return to remain relevant in Pakistan's politics.
Before
coming to Islamabad, he did travel to the US to try to establish
his moderate credentials with the US establishment, which has always
perceived him to be a 'closet fundamentalist', after his attempts
to bring in the Shariat during his last tenure as prime minister
of Pakistan. Despite dressing up in a suit and making all the right
statements, it does not seem that he was able to establish his moderate
credentials with the authorities in the US.
From
a purely tactical point of view, Musharraf has gained significantly
by deporting Nawaz Sharif to Saudi Arabia, where the Saudis are
unlikely to let him move out, nor will they allow him to continue
his political activities unhindered. By deporting Nawaz, Musharraf
has also thrown a challenge to the Supreme Court and it is for the
court to pick up the gauntlet. The fact that the court did not take
suo motu cognisance of the developments indicate that even the judiciary
is weighing its options for the time being.
The
government is likely to take a stand in the court that Nawaz has
chosen to migrate to avoid prison and if the court still passes
a stricture, Musharraf might put the blame on the government and
even sacrifice Shaukat Aziz. As it is, the presidential spokesman
has asked the media to quiz the government about the deportation
of Nawaz Sharif, because the president had no hand in it.
However,
if the court attempts to confront Musharraf head on, it runs the
risk of being made irrelevant. The army might just force a couple
of weak-kneed judges to resign, or may even lock up the court for
a few days. As far as Nawaz is concerned, he is virtually out of
the political scene for the next three years as the Saudis are unlikely
to allow him to indulge in politics from their territory this time.
In
his absence, his wife Kulsoom Nawaz and brother Shahbaz Sharif will
attempt to galvanise the party's support base by reaching Pakistan
at different times. However, if Musharraf manages to deal with the
challenge effectively, like he dealt with Nawaz, he would have marginalized
one major foe. The public reaction and the international response
to the deportation might force Benazir to reconsider her deal with
Musharraf and it is significant that she remains in the opposition
so she does not let the MMA usurp the entire anti-Musharraf vote
bank, at least at this crucial juncture.
There
is no doubt that the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) will be
able to mobilise the masses in Punjab province to some extent but
in the absence of Nawaz they will find it difficult to build up
a mass movement against Musharraf, who it appears has already made
up his mind to contest the poll in uniform next month whether Benazir
comes on board or not.
The
reaction of the Supreme Court in Nawaz Sharif's case will allow
him to judge the court's response to his re-election and plan his
strategy. After the elections, if public discontent rises and international
pressure increases, he might shed his uniform after appointing a
new army chief and go in for negotiations with Benazir. This might
give him some respite till the new army chief consolidates his position
or is succeeded by the next one in 2010.
However,
the most significant aspect of the recent incident is the foreign
involvement. Reports emanating from Islamabad indicate that the
Saudis insisted that Nawaz be sent to Jeddah to complete his 10-year
tenure of exile. This indicates the discomfort of the house of Al
Saud with any semblance of democracy in the Islamic world. It is
significant to note that in the immediate aftermath, anti-Saudi
Arabia slogans were raised by PML-N supporters who were mostly Sunnis,
probably a first for Pakistan. Though some media reports have indicated
that Saudis acted at the behest of the US, it appears to be unlikely
as is borne out by the strong statement issued by State Department
officials against the deportation.
Moreover,
the US probably realises that such steps only strengthen fundamentalist
forces. History indicates that in Islamic society, whenever autocratic
regimes have denied the right of democratic dissent, the opposition
to the regime has invariably emerged from the ramparts of the mosque.
The denial of democracy therefore will only fuel extremism in Pakistan.
|