|
Hindu
Council UK Condemns use of Beef and Pork in Chicken Products
London, 8 June 2009
The
Hindu Council UK (HCUK) has reacted with shock and disgust to the
news that food manufacturers in three EU states have used bulking
agents made from pork and beef bones and gristle to inflate chicken
breasts, before selling them on to the UK market at a higher price.
The news, confirmed following tests run by the Food Standards Authority
(FSA), means any one of Britain's 600,000 plus Hindus ' forbidden
by their religion to eat beef ' may have unwittingly done so in
cafes and restaurants across the country in at least the last two
years.
On
hearing the news, Anil Bhanot, General Secretary of the HCUK said:"'For
many Hindus, to eat beef is as bad as cannibalism. All branches
of Hinduism revere cows because they give milk to humanity, as a
mother does to her child. The companies who hoodwinked us by not
fully disclosing the nature of the ingredients they have used to
plump up chickens artificially ought to be reprimanded through all
legal channels, and also made to give up part of their profits to
good causes. At least then any Hindu who has unknowingly eaten these
chicken products will feel some degree of cleansing."
The companies managed to get away with their actions because the
pork and beef additives had been so highly processed they did not
show up in standard tests. It wasn't until the FSA developed new,
highly sophisticated tests that the swindle came to light.
New
study highlights undeclared ingredients in chicken products
The
Food Standards Agency (FSA) had carried out an exploratory study
into injection powders used to retain water in chicken breast products
supplied mainly to the catering trade. Water can be added to chicken
products by manufacturers for a number of reasons, for example to
improve the succulence of the meat. Adding water to chicken is permitted,
but where the water content is greater than 5%, water must be declared
in the name of the food and listed as an ingredient. Fresh chicken
meat that you buy from supermarkets or butchers cannot have any
ingredients, including water, deliberately added to it.
The
agents used to hold added water in chicken can include salt, phosphates
and hydrolysed animal proteins; these are supplied to manufacturers
in mixtures as injection powders. When water retaining agents are
used, they must be described accurately on the label.
The
FSAs snapshot study looked at a small number of injection
powders that claimed to contain only chicken protein. Analysis using
a new approach developed under the Agencys authenticity programme
indicated that proteins from beef or pork were also present in some
of the samples. Hydrolysed pork and beef proteins can be used as
water retaining agents in chicken as long as they are properly labelled.
Use of these proteins does not make chicken products unsafe, but
it is important that people are given accurate information about
their food.
The
FSA has now advised Hindus to avoid chicken products labelled as
containing 'hydrolised (chicken) proteins,' and to ask in restaurants
whether chicken products contain hydrolysed animal proteins.
About
the Hindu Council UK
The Hindu Council UK is the representative umbrella body for the
British Hindu community. It operates under a mandate from the Hindu
public established in 1994. It is the only British Hindu body co-ordinating
all the different schools of Hindu theology within the UK. For more
information visit www.hinducounciluk.org
Top
|