|
Study reveals marriage dowry
as major cause of poverty in Bangladesh
(30 October 2008)
A
new study has revealed that the marriage dowry
is a major cause of poverty in Bangladesh. More
than 35 million people in the country, around
a quarter of its population, face acute poverty
and hunger. Dowry payments of more than 200 times
the daily wage and costly medical expenses are
major causes of this chronic poverty claims the
new research by Dr Peter Davies from the University
of Bath.
The custom of paying a dowry
to the future husband's family when a daughter
is married is illegal in Bangladesh, but is still
practised by most families living in rural areas.
Payment is normally upwards from 20,000 Taka (around
£190) and since typical earnings are only
100 Taka (94 pence) per day, this can be a major
contributor to poverty for many families with
daughters.
Dr Peter Davis, of the Centre
for Development Studies based in the University's
Department of Economics & International Development,
has been investigating the issues forcing families
into poverty as part of a long-term study in collaboration
with the International Food Policy Research Institute
(IFPRI), the Chronic Poverty Research Centre (CPRC),
and Data Analysis and Technical Assistance Ltd.,
Dhaka (DATA).
The research found that those
households with lower levels of education, that
owned less land, had fewer assets and had many
young children and elderly relatives, faced the
most difficulty in escaping poverty. Dr Davis
found that medical expenses involved in the care
of elderly relatives were also a common issue
for families living in poverty.
"Some families face
a 'double whammy', having to pay wedding expenses
and dowry for their daughters at the same time
in life when elderly relatives are needing more
expensive medical care," said Dr Davis, who
spent several months in the country training and
working with researchers from DATA Bangladesh
to conduct interviews with families for the study.
"Measures such as improving
education, employment and health services could
play a really significant role in alleviating
poverty in these families. The government in Bangladesh
has already taken positive steps in increasing
the enrolment of girls in schools, which should
decrease the practice of giving and demanding
dowry."
The researchers surveyed
2,000 households based in 102 rural villages across
Bangladesh, that were originally interviewed between
eight and 14 years ago, to assess the changes
in poverty and well-being that occurred over time.
They found that almost half moved out of poverty
during this time, but around one fifth remained
chronically poor and a small percentage fell into
poverty.
Uniquely, the researchers
combined household data with about 300 individual
life histories to provide a deeper understanding
of the causes of chronic poverty in the country,
rather than purely using quantitative conventional
research approaches. Dr Davis explained: "This
research is different because it is qualitative
as well as quantitative, so it doesn't just measure
the trends, but also finds out the stories behind
the trends.
"The life histories
collected for this study show that many poor people's
lives improve and decline in a 'saw-tooth' pattern,
where slow improvements are reversed by sharp
declines caused by events such as illness, large
medical expenses, wedding expenses and legal disputes.
"This contrasts with
the smooth pattern of progress or decline which
is often suggested by more conventional research
approaches.'
Dr Davis presented the findings
with collaborators Agnes Quisumbing from IFPRI
and Bob Baulch from the Chronic Poverty Research
Centre at a workshop in August in Dhaka, Bangladesh.
The workshop was chaired by the director of the
Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies and
was attended by more than 100 senior government
officials, international donors and civil society
representatives.
Dr Davis added: "We've
had a lot of very positive feedback on the research
we presented at the workshop and we are planning
to hold further meetings with senior government
officials and policy makers after the December
elections."
Top |