Searching
for Blunkett's Brits?
By Lopa Patel (December 2001)
David Blunkett's comments suggesting ethnic minorities adopt "Britishness"
brought a wry smile to my face. It seems to me that nobody, but
nobody, wants to be British nowadays anyway. English, Welsh, Scottish
and Irish, yes. But British? How else can one explain the "British"
obsession with finding an ancestor who might have been part Spanish,
French, Viking, Troglodyte, whatever?
Although
a passport may define our right to reside in a particular country,
it hardly affects our own sense of who we are. And, in any case
we are all transferring to European passports - a status which almost
everyone eschews. Setting aside passport issues for the moment,
how else can our sense of national identity be measured?
Ability
to speak English is hardly a pre-requisite. Indeed the "British"
are renowned the world over for being unable to speak any language
other than English. Here our European counterparts, like the Dutch,
Belgian and French triumph once more. On average, most can speak
at least two languages. So asking ethnic minorities to speak English
- c'est un peu "riche" n'est ce pas?
Perhaps
our sense of national identity is measured by where we live. Liverpudlians,
Brummies and Jordies all have pride in their regional roots. However,
as a high proportion of ethnic minorities live in poor, deprived
inner city areas, the term "ghettoites" is hardly going
to fuel renewed nationalistic vigour.
Maybe
our food defines us? But with curry rating as the UK's favourite
dish, this could create even more confusion. A browse along any
major supermarket shelf - laden with Noon convenience foods, Pataks
pickles, Madhur Jaffrey's sauces, Karan Bilimoria's Cobra beer and
Darjeeling Tea may not help. And isn't it fantastic that you can
even purchase mangoes, guavas, pineapples, coriander, ginger, garlic
and okra along with ready-to-eat spotted dick. Variety is truly
the spice of life - in the kitchen anyhow.
Of
course, it could be that we should all go out and mix some more.
For first generation ethnic business owners who sell goods to their
own social groups, it is the supreme law of commerce that dictates
that they should be located in an area where their customers are.
Indeed, the beleaguered corner shop would hardly be called such
if there were no street corners. The decline of this imminently
useful local shop is due to the emergence of the supermarket - manned
24/7 by more ethnic minorities. And it does not end there; hospitals,
public services, transport all rely heavily on these very same people.
So exactly how are they supposed to get out more?
For
second and third generation Asians, this furore is bemusing. Most
speak excellent English, work in international companies, relax
and mix with all types of people, marry whomever they choose, enjoy
'British' life to full - such as it is. Indeed they need no encouragement
to get out and socialise more!
Perhaps,
David Blunkett is a little overworked and needs to get out more
himself. Maybe he should pop out to visit one of the 8,000 curry
houses, that daily serve up the nation's favourite dish, to indulge
in an authentic "Ruby Mary", that's cockney for a curry!
(Are cockneys an ethnic minority? Ed.)
Agree
or Disagree with these views?
Why not share your viewpoint with others, click
here.
|