|
Images of Hindu deities
are showing up in trendy boutiques on a
huge variety of household objects--even
nightlights--but the lunchbox is the most
popular. Accoutrements, a Seattle-based
wholesale distributor of the "novelty
items," lists the "Hindu Krishna
lunchbox" as its fourth biggest seller
and the goddess Kali lunchbox as its fifth
biggest seller, right behind the "wiggly
hula girl" and the "nun punching
puppet." The lunchboxes, which Accoutrements
first introduced to the American market
in 1998, were inspired by the "beautiful,
bright, and appealing" depictions of
Hindu gods on Indian posters, says Heather
Conrad, the company's public relations director.
In India, images of
deities are ubiquitous, with religious stickers
and posters covering virtually every Hindu-owned
rickshaw, phone booth and tea stall in the
country. Sacred images are even common in
Indian advertisements, with baby Krishna
endorsing his favorite brand of butter and
Lakshmi promising prosperity to those who
eat her own brand of rice. While one can
hardly imagine a parched Jesus wandering
through the desert and then gulping down
a bottle of Coca-Cola in an American commercial,
the Hindu equivalent is not uncommon in
Indian advertising. Such ads are always
done with an unquestionable reverence for
the divine.
In the United States,
however, the Hindu sacred image has taken
on a secular life of its own. Few American
consumers understand the religious or cultural
significance of such images, and value them
for their "exotic" novelty and
third-world kitsch. Varun Soni, a graduate
student in religion at University of California
at Santa Barbara and a devout Hindu, sees
the lunchboxes as part of a recent fad of
"commodifying Hinduism as exotic to
appeal to the trendy sense of New Age orientalists."
The attraction of "other people's gods"
wears away once the consumer realizes how
complex and different the other civilization
really is, says Soni. Ajoy Vachler, a Hindu
working in finance in New York, does not
like seeing pictures of his religion's gods
on American consumer goods. While Indians
invoke sacred images for reasons of "comfort,
affection, respect or good luck," he
says, in the United States the same images
are "at the very least distasteful"
when they appear on lunchboxes and T-shirts.
But not all Hindus
agree. Malini Saith-Doddamani, a New Haven,
Conn.-based writer and member of the South
Asian Journalist Association, says that
many of her co-religionists "relish
the idea that something so isolated to India
appeared, in whatever form, in the consciousness
of the American public." Gagan Kanwar,
a software developer in Austin, Texas, maintains
that "as long as the religious icons
are not desecrated or ridiculed there should
be no reason to worry" about their
appearance on American novelty items.
Other Hindus believe
that while the products are not offensive
in and of themselves, they have potential
to be used in sacrilegious ways. Gaurang
Desai, a Hindu who occasionally wears a
Ram T-shirt, says that the "problem
comes up only when [sacred images] are associated
with inappropriate action."
Concerns of Desai and
others over the casual treatment of Hindu
images arise from the significance of the
sacred image in Hinduism. For Hindus, a
primary medium of contact with the divine
is mutual visual exchange. The images involved
do not just depict the divine; they actually
contain the divine presence. In other words,
that's not only a picture of Shiva on your
T-shirt, it's an incarnation of Shiva himself.
A failure to understand
this point can lead to grave, if usually
inadvertent, irreverence.
I myself encountered
an instance of such misunderstanding of
the Hindu concept of the sacred when I recently
visited the gift shop at the Chicago Cultural
Center. The shop prominently displayed a
stack of Hindu deity lunchboxes arranged
carefully on the floor, with one box's image
of Kali face-down on the carpet. When I
explained to store employees that Hindus
would regard this as a desecration, they
apologized immediately and moved the display
onto a table. It was clear that no one at
the store had intended any disrespect; the
employees had simply not understood the
special reverence that Hindus have for sacred
images.
At the same time, many
Hindus have a positive view of the lunchboxes
and T-shirts, seeing them as tools for educating
the American public about Hinduism. Saith-Daddamani
says that wearing a T-shirt bearing an image
of Ganesh "may spark interest and at
the very least a conversation" about
Hinduism that could ultimately lead to "the
beginning of knowledge, awareness and the
option to understand." Shobhana Chandra,
a Hindu living in New Jersey, expresses
similar sentiments. She contends that the
images "can become ambassadors"
of Hinduism, allowing "people to get
interested enough to
ask questions
about Hinduism." Heather Conrad of
Accoutrements insists that her company's
goal is "to entertain and educate,"
and that "exposing Americans to diverse
religious icons supports this goal."
Nonetheless, some Hindus,
such as Varun Soni, maintain that the educational
effect of toting a Krishna lunchbox or installing
a Kali nightlight in one's bathroom is likely
to be too superficial to offset the potential
for mistreating the images. The current
fad for pop pictures of deities "encourages
only a cursory knowledge of Hinduism,"
says Soni, adding that the knowledge will
likely dissipate as soon as the fad wanes.
|